Skip to main content
3GPP standards intelligenceIndependent · Source-linked · Updated after plenary meetings

3GPP Explorer

What mobile standards decided — and what those decisions mean.

6G migration splits the industry three ways, and the choice slips to RAN#114

A 14-company coalition led by Samsung, Qualcomm and NTT DOCOMO wants a 6G-anchored link to 5G; Nokia and Ericsson want none; CMCC, Orange and satellite operators want dual registration.

Based on 20 decisions across 13 meetings. Study agreements are not yet normative specifications.

Current standards status

One generation in service. One still being negotiated.

Compare the full monitor →

5G‑Advanced

Normative work

Standardized and evolving

Release track
Rel-15 → Rel-20
Current edge
AI/ML, Ambient IoT, NTN and energy efficiency
Evidence
107 tracked decisions
Verified
30 June 2026
Open 5G status →

6G

Study phase

Study agreements, not yet a normative standard

Release track
Rel-20 studies → Rel-21 normative work
Current edge
Requirements, waveform, architecture and migration choices
Evidence
30 tracked decisions
Verified
30 June 2026
Open 6G status →

3GPP Quarterly · September 2026

The decisions behind the next network release.

13 meetings70 decisionsEvery claim linked to source material

Technology Briefings

Technologies that made it through.

All briefings →

Explore the source material

Move from the interpretation to the specification.

The quarterly brief

Follow what 3GPP actually decided.

Decisions, rejected proposals and changes to 5G‑Advanced and 6G — with links to the source documents. Sent around the 3GPP plenaries and major events.

At most eight emails a year. Double opt-in. Unsubscribe in one click.