5G-Advanced phones will get channel reports from a fixed SIB1 recipe, not on demand
Samsung, Huawei and seven others beat CATT and ZTE's push for a separate system-information block; MSG4 signaling stays static, not dynamic.
Source meetings for this article (9)
Meetings in this article’s source material. Inclusion does not mean that every meeting approved every decision.
- SA#1129 Jun 2026 – 12 Jun 2026 · Singapore · 3GPP ↗
- RAN#1128 Jun 2026 – 11 Jun 2026 · Singapore · 3GPP ↗
- RAN1#12518 May 2026 – 22 May 2026 · China · 3GPP ↗
- RAN4#11918 May 2026 – 22 May 2026 · China · 3GPP ↗
- SA5#16613 Apr 2026 – 17 Apr 2026 · Saint Paul's Bay · 3GPP ↗
- SA5#16718 May 2026 – 22 May 2026 · China · 3GPP ↗
- RAN3#13218 May 2026 – 22 May 2026 · China · 3GPP ↗
- SA2#17518 May 2026 – 22 May 2026 · China · 3GPP ↗
- RAN2#13418 May 2026 – 22 May 2026 · China · 3GPP ↗
3GPP QuarterlyThe next issue by email, at most eight a year.
Getting a phone's channel quality report to the network fast after it connects sounds like plumbing, but it splits vendors into camps with real implementation costs. Samsung, Huawei, Xiaomi, MediaTek and six others wanted the configuration for early channel and sounding reports broadcast in SIB1, the block every phone reads before it even sends its first uplink message — guaranteeing the setup is always there. CATT, ZTE, Ofinno and 1Finity argued for a dedicated new SIB instead, which would keep SIB1 leaner but adds a new broadcast channel for chipsets to parse. 3GPP sided with the SIB1 camp in May, closing a debate that had run since the previous meeting.
The same session locked the trigger mechanism: the network signals which pre-configured report to use via a MAC control element riding inside MSG4, the fourth message of the random-access handshake. InterDigital, Nokia, vivo, ZTE and ETRI wanted this MAC-CE to also dynamically carry parameters like the SRS repetition factor and the number of tracking-reference-signal bursts, giving the network per-device tuning. Samsung, Huawei, Qualcomm and six others won the argument for keeping those values static in system information instead — a simpler MAC-CE, but one-size-fits-all coverage settings for every device joining the cell.
For massive-MIMO deployments running 48, 64 or up to 128 antenna ports, 3GPP confirmed that low-density channel reference signals — as sparse as one resource element in eight per port — must still land within one or two consecutive time slots, a restriction carried over from Release 19. But the group found no consensus to also restrict which frequency resource blocks these signals can occupy, despite a coalition of LG, Huawei, vivo, Samsung, Qualcomm, NTT DOCOMO and others pushing new subband sizes, like a 12-PRB subband for 24-72 PRB carriers. CATT was the lone objector, and the proposal stayed parked without a stated reason.
Uplink sounding got its own tug-of-war. 3GPP agreed the network will set, via RRC signaling, how many frequency starting positions (K) an SRS signal can hop to within a repetition, and clarified exactly how a sounding resource spanning two slots aligns its start. ZTE and ETRI then asked for pseudo-random hopping patterns on top, to scatter interference between users in dense cells; Samsung, Qualcomm, Sony and Xiaomi rejected it, saying existing hopping rules already sweep all resource blocks. The interference-randomization feature stays off the table for now.
Two threads carry into the next rounds. RAN4 has already picked 35, 70 and 140-second switching periods for the enhanced low-band carrier-aggregation mode that lets a phone receive on two carriers at once without transmitting on both — 3GPP agreed a change to TS38.213 is needed to support it, with only Huawei dissenting. Separately, UE-triggered beam reporting still lacks rules for what happens when its uplink control message collides with other signals; the chair has asked proponents to justify the change with concrete numbers before RAN1 revisits it.
The decisions behind this
SRS capacity and coverage enhancements move forward with key agreements
This topic is about improving the uplink reference signals (SRS) used by the network to measure channel quality for MIMO. The goal is to increase how many devices can send these signals simultaneously (capacity) and how reliably they can be received (coverage). The working group RAN1, responsible for the physical layer, made several agreements at its May meeting (RAN1#125).
On the number of starting positions for SRS repetition symbols within each frequency hop (denoted as K), it was agreed that "The number of starting positions for SRS repetition symbols within each SRS frequency hop (i.e. K) is configured by higher layer signaling per resource configuration."
For the per-resource slot offset (k') used to schedule aperiodic SRS across two slots, the group agreed on its definition: "For the per-resource offset k’ of an AP SRS resource, If the SRS resource set is spanned over two slots: When k' = 0 or 1, the first slot of the SRS resource is the first or second of the two slots spanned by the SRS resource set, respectively. If the SRS resource set is confined within one slot: When k' = 0 or 1, the slot of the SRS resource is the slot of the SRS resource set. k' = III by default, if k' is not configured for an SRS resource. Note: The first slot of the SRS resource set is determined by slot offset k and available slot offset t configured per SRS resource set." It was also agreed that "Reusing of a SRS resource configured with per resource slot offset k' in more than one SRS resource sets is supported."
On the definition of a transmission occasion for a cross-slot SRS resource, a proposal was made: "Support updating the definition of SRS transmission occasion for across slot SRS resource: a SRS transmission occasion is defined by two consecutive S and U slots, a first symbol s within S slot and a number of consecutive symbols L where the last symbol is within U slot." The document notes that companies like ZTE and ETRI questioned the necessity of this update, while others like Samsung and Spreadtrum argued clarifications are needed. The meeting did not adopt this proposal.
Regarding the combination of two different SRS frequency hopping techniques (R17 RPFS start RB index hopping and R20 intra-repetition hopping), a group of companies led by ZTE proposed a conclusion: "Simultaneous enabling of the R17 RPFS start RB index hopping across multiple legacy SRS frequency hopping periods and intra-repetition hopping for SRS repetition symbols within each SRS frequency hop for all the allowed combinations of PF and K (i.e.,PF=4/K=2, PF=2/K=2 and PF=4/K=4) is supported." They also proposed specific pseudo-random hopping patterns for interference randomization. Other companies, including Samsung, Qualcomm, and Sony, argued this was already covered by a previous agreement from RAN1#124 and saw no need for the new proposal. The meeting did not adopt these new proposals.
| For clarifying and finalizing configuration rules | Against introducing new pseudo-random hopping patterns |
|---|---|
| Samsung · Qualcomm · ZTE · ETRI · Xiaomi · Spreadtrum6 companies | Samsung · Qualcomm · Sony · ZTE4 companies |
The agreements solidify how 5G-Advanced networks will configure more flexible uplink sounding. Configuring the number of frequency starting points (K) via higher-layer signaling gives the network precise control over the sounding pattern. The clarified rules for the per-resource slot offset (k') resolve ambiguity in scheduling aperiodic SRS that span slot boundaries, making implementation more straightforward. The lack of decision on new pseudo-random hopping patterns means the existing, simpler patterns from earlier releases will likely be reused for these specific cases, avoiding added complexity.
Early CSI acquisition for 5G-Advanced: key proposals for faster network entry
This topic is about improving how a phone (UE) quickly provides channel state information (CSI) to the network when it first connects or when a secondary cell (SCell) is activated. Good CSI is crucial for the network to choose the best beams and modulation for MIMO transmissions. The working group RAN1, responsible for the physical layer, is discussing enhancements for Release 20 under the NR MIMO Phase 6 work item.
A moderator summary document compiled proposals from various companies for discussion. The document's status is 'noted', meaning the meeting took note of its contents but did not make final decisions on the proposals. The document states it 'will be used for our first Rel-20 NR MIMO offline/online discussion'.
On the issue of where to configure parameters for early triggering when a UE moves from idle to connected mode, there was a split in company views. For storing the Sounding Reference Signal (SRS) and CSI configurations, some companies (including Huawei, Samsung, and Nokia) supported putting them in the existing System Information Block 1 (SIB1). Others (including CATT, ZTE, and Futurewei) preferred a new, dedicated SIBx. The moderator noted that proponents of SIB1 argued it 'can ensure UE always receives configuration before MSG3', while questioning how a new SIBx would guarantee this.
On how the UE should report its capability for these early procedures in message 3 (MSG3) of the random-access process, most companies (including MediaTek, Nokia, Samsung, and Huawei) supported a 'bitmap-based' method where each bit corresponds to a configuration provided in system information. A few companies, like Xiaomi and ZTE, preferred an 'index-based' method to save signaling overhead.
Regarding dynamic signaling, there was no consensus to support indicating the SRS repetition factor or the number of Tracking Reference Signal (TRS) bursts dynamically via a Medium Access Control Control Element (MAC-CE) in MSG4. The summary states: 'There is no RAN1 consensus to support the dynamic indication of the repetition factor and the number of TRS burst(s) via MAC-CE in MSG4'. Instead, these parameters would be configured in system information (SIBx). Companies like Huawei argued against this, stating that without dynamic indication, the network would need to configure multiple resource sets, causing 'huge resource overhead'.
| Prefer static RRC configuration in SIB | Prefer dynamic MAC-CE indication |
|---|---|
| Nokia · ZTE · MediaTek · Xiaomi · Qualcomm5 companies | Huawei · InterDigital · NEC · Ericsson4 companies |
The discussions show the industry is working to reduce latency when a device joins the network or when secondary cells are activated in 5G-Advanced. The goal is to get critical channel information (CSI and SRS) to the base station faster than in current 5G, enabling optimal MIMO performance sooner after connection. The lack of consensus on dynamic signaling versus static configuration highlights a trade-off between flexibility and signaling simplicity that remains to be resolved.
- DecidedRAN1 agrees that a specification change is needed for 5G's new low-band carrier aggregation modeR1-2604981
- DecidedNo dynamic control of SRS repetition or TRS bursts via MSG4 MAC-CER1-2603720
- DecidedEarly CSI acquisition for idle-to-connected transition will use SIB1 for configurationR1-2603720
- DeferredProposal to add pseudo-random hopping for SRS frequency starting positions was not adoptedR1-2603898
- DeferredEarly CSI configurations for idle-mode devices will be broadcast in SIB1R1-2603723
- DeferredProposal for new SRS hopping patterns to randomize interference did not gain consensusR1-2605073