Description
Restricted Local Operator Services (RLOS) is a service control mechanism defined within the 3GPP architecture, primarily managed by the Home Subscriber Server (HSS) and applied through the Policy and Charging Control (PCC) framework. The core function of RLOS is to impose a specific service profile on a user's session, which selectively permits only a predefined set of services deemed essential or locally relevant by the network operator. When a user is flagged for RLOS, the HSS provides an indication to the serving network nodes, such as the MME in EPS or the AMF in 5GS. This indication triggers the enforcement of a corresponding PCC rule set, which is configured to allow only certain traffic flow templates (TFTs). Typically, these permitted TFTs are for accessing the operator's own service network (e.g., for customer care, balance top-up, or service portals) and for emergency services (e.g., calls to 112, 911). All other outgoing communication attempts, such as regular voice calls or data sessions to the public internet, are blocked by the Policy and Charging Enforcement Function (PCEF) or the Session Management Function (SMF) with UPF. The architecture integrates with the Rx and Gx interfaces (or their 5GC equivalents) to dynamically apply these policies. RLOS is not a standalone network function but a service logic implemented across core network elements, leveraging existing subscription data and policy control mechanisms to achieve granular service restriction. Its role is to provide a flexible tool for operators to manage service accessibility in a controlled manner, aligning with commercial, regulatory, or network management needs without requiring complete service disconnection.
Purpose & Motivation
RLOS was introduced to address specific operational and commercial scenarios where a subscriber needs to be restricted from making general outgoing calls but must retain access to a minimal set of operator-managed services. A primary use case is for inbound roamers who have not established a roaming agreement or whose credit has been exhausted; instead of denying all service, the operator can apply RLOS to allow the user to contact customer service for assistance or to top up their account. It also serves users on restrictive service plans, ensuring they can always reach emergency services and operator support. Historically, without such a feature, the options were binary: either full service access or complete service barring. RLOS provides a middle ground, enhancing customer experience by maintaining a lifeline to essential services while protecting the operator from potential revenue loss from unpaid usage. Its creation was motivated by the need for more sophisticated service control within the PCC architecture defined from Release 7 onwards, allowing for dynamic, policy-driven service differentiation beyond simple barring lists.
What changed in its specifications
The latest release-to-release comparison of specifications that define RLOS. Each summary describes the whole specification, not only this term.
NB-IoT/eMTC support for Non-Terrestrial Networks: adds QCI characteristic for satellite access, note on GEO/LEO delays, and PCRF policy control for satellite PDN connections.
Full comparison in TS 23.203 →Rel-19 brings only minor changes to TS 23.221: 0 clauses changed, with no change attributed to a release feature.
Full comparison in TS 23.221 →Release Timeline
Detected Changes Across Releases
from 3GPP Change RequestsSpecific changes extracted from the „Change history“ tables of 3GPP specifications (65 CRs across 3 releases). Complements the general historical overview above with the evidence-based evolution of this function.
Studied in Rel-15, normative work from Rel-16.
- Support for Restricted Local Operator Services in 23.203 TS 23.203CR1125
- Support for Restricted Local Operator Services in EPC TS 23.401CR3491
- RLOS definitions TS 24.229CR6325
- RLOS registration TS 24.229CR6326
- RLOS session setup TS 24.229CR6327
- RLOS for UICC less case TS 24.229CR6348
+ 53 more changes
- Correction in the P-CSCF operation upon recipt of REGISTER request for RLOS TS 24.229CR6442
- Improve readability of section L.3.2.8.2 for P-CSCF handling of REGISTER request for RLOS TS 24.229CR6480
- Correction in the restricted local operator services TS 24.301CR3456
- Enabling E-UTRA capability triggered by RLOS call TS 24.301CR3691
- Resolve ENs for RLOS session setup TS 24.229CR6441
Defining Specifications
3GPP specifications that define or reference RLOS, with the latest known release. Sourced from the 3GPP document catalog — see methodology.
| Specification | Title | Release |
|---|---|---|
| TS 23.203 vk10 | Policy and Charging Control Architecture | Rel-20 read |
| TS 23.221 vj00 | 3GPP System Architectural Requirements | Rel-19 read |
| TS 23.401 vk10 | Evolved Packet System Architecture | Rel-20 read |
| TR 23.715 vg00 | Study on access to restricted local operator services | Rel-16 read |
| TS 24.229 vk10 | IMS SIP/SDP Call Control Protocol | Rel-20 read |
| TS 24.301 vk10 | EPS NAS Mobility and Session Management | Rel-20 read |
| TS 24.368 vk00 | NAS Configuration Management Object | Rel-20 read |
| TS 29.165 vk00 | Inter-IMS Network-to-Network Interface (II-NNI) | Rel-20 read |
| TS 29.212 vk00 | Diameter-Based PCC Reference Points | Rel-20 read |
| TS 29.213 vj30 | PCC Procedures and Flows | Rel-19 read |
| TS 29.214 vk00 | Rx Interface for Policy and Charging Control | Rel-20 read |
| TS 29.274 vk00 | GTPv2-C Control Plane Protocol | Rel-20 read |
| TS 31.102 vk00 | USIM Application Specification | Rel-20 read |
| TS 33.401 vj20 | EPS Security Architecture | Rel-19 read |
| TS 33.815 vg01 | Security Study for PARLOS/RLOS | Rel-16 read |
| TS 36.331 vj40 | E-UTRA Radio Resource Control (RRC) Protocol | Rel-19 read |