Description
The Maintenance Operations Protocol (MOP) is a standardized protocol suite within 3GPP specifications designed for the Operation, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) of telecommunications network equipment. It provides a framework for the remote management of network elements (NEs) such as base stations (eNodeBs/gNBs), core network nodes, and other infrastructure components. MOP defines the interfaces, message formats, and procedures necessary for an Operations Support System (OSS) or Network Manager (NM) to communicate with managed NEs. This communication enables critical functions like software download and activation, configuration management, fault supervision, and performance measurement collection.
Architecturally, MOP operates within the management plane, separate from the user and control planes. It typically utilizes a manager-agent model where the OSS/NM acts as the manager initiating operations, and the network element hosts an agent that executes commands and reports status. The protocol stack often relies on underlying transport protocols like TCP/IP for reliable message delivery. MOP specifications detail a variety of Managed Objects (MOs) that represent configurable and monitorable resources within the NE, such as hardware components, software modules, and logical interfaces. Operations on these objects include Create, Read, Update, Delete (CRUD), notifications (for alarms and events), and file transfer for software packages.
The role of MOP is fundamental to achieving automated, efficient, and standardized network operations. It allows for centralized management of multi-vendor networks by providing a common language between management systems and equipment from different manufacturers. This reduces operational costs, minimizes manual intervention, and accelerates the deployment of new services and features. By facilitating remote maintenance, MOP is essential for managing large-scale, geographically dispersed networks like those in 5G, where manual site visits are impractical. Its procedures ensure that network elements can be kept up-to-date, monitored for health, and repaired or reconfigured without disrupting user services.
Purpose & Motivation
MOP was created to address the growing complexity and scale of mobile networks, which made manual, on-site maintenance operations increasingly costly, slow, and error-prone. Prior to standardization, vendors often used proprietary protocols for element management, forcing operators to use multiple, isolated management systems for different vendor equipment. This led to high operational expenditure (OPEX), integration challenges, and hindered automated, end-to-end service provisioning.
The primary motivation for standardizing MOP within 3GPP was to enable multi-vendor interoperability in the management plane. By defining a common protocol, operators could use a single OSS or Network Manager to control and maintain equipment from various suppliers. This drives competition, reduces vendor lock-in, and simplifies network operations. Furthermore, as networks evolved from 3G to 4G and 5G, featuring concepts like Network Function Virtualization (NFV) and network slicing, the need for agile, software-driven, and automated lifecycle management became paramount. MOP provides the foundational mechanisms for these advanced operations, such as instantiation, scaling, and healing of virtualized network functions (VNFs). It solves the problem of maintaining service continuity and network reliability in increasingly software-defined and dense network environments.
Classification
Detected Changes Across Releases
from 3GPP Change RequestsSpecific changes extracted from the „Change history“ tables of 3GPP specifications (1 CRs across 1 releases). Complements the general historical overview above with the evidence-based evolution of this function.
Studied in Rel-8, normative work from Rel-18.
In Release 18, enhancements for the MOP function were introduced within the framework of RAN sharing and automated energy efficiency control. Specifically, the release defined procedures for the Master Operator to calculate and provide Energy Efficiency (EE) KPI values to Participating Operators. It also formalized key functions for self-managed energy efficiency, including EE Policy Management and EE Control and Coordination, based on collected statistics like EE KPI and QoS/QoE.
- Maintenance CR for Ka-band coexistence results to TR 38.863 TS 38.863CR0020
Explore further
Broader topics and technologies where MOP plays a role.
Defining Specifications
3GPP specifications that define or reference MOP, with the latest known release. Sourced from the 3GPP document catalog — see methodology.
| Specification | Title | Release |
|---|---|---|
| TR 28.813 vh00 | Study on New Energy Efficiency Aspects for 5G | Rel-17 |
| TR 28.825 vh00 | 5G Network Sharing Management Study | Rel-17 |
| TS 32.130 vj20 | Network Sharing OAM&P Requirements | Rel-19 |
| TS 32.425 vj00 | E-UTRAN Performance Measurements | Rel-19 |
| TS 33.117 vk00 | Catalogue of General Security Assurance Requirements | Rel-20 |
| TS 36.101 vj30 | LTE UE Radio Transmission & Reception Requirements | Rel-19 |
| TS 36.755 vf00 | US 600 MHz LTE Band 71 Technical Report | Rel-15 |
| TS 36.858 ve00 | LTE 2.6 GHz SDL Band Technical Report | Rel-14 |
| TS 37.814 vc00 | L-band Supplemental Downlink for UTRA/E-UTRA | Rel-12 |
| TR 37.880 vh20 | High-power UE for fixed-wireless/vehicle use | Rel-17 |
| TS 38.101 vj31 | NR User Equipment Radio Transmissions | Rel-19 |
| TS 38.521 vj20 | NR Physical Layer UE Conformance Testing | Rel-19 |
| TS 38.741 vj00 | NTN L-/S-band for NR Technical Specification | Rel-19 |
| TS 38.831 vg10 | UE RF Requirements for FR2 Enhancements | Rel-16 |
| TS 38.863 vj10 | NR NTN RF and Co-existence Spec | Rel-19 |
| TR 38.892 vi00 | Technical Report | Rel-18 |
| TR 38.903 vj00 | Test Tolerances & Measurement Uncertainties | Rel-19 |