Menu
Latest
12 meetings · Prague, Jeju · 12–16 Oct
Reports
RAN1#126-bis · SA2#177

Glossary term · Physical Layer

LOS

Line of Sight

Physical Layer →

LOS is a radio propagation condition where a direct, unobstructed path exists between a transmitter and receiver, fundamental for evaluating channel characteristics and performance.

Introduced
Rel-6
Where
Radio Access Network › NG-RAN (5G)
Specifications
19 specs
Also in
User Equipment, Testing
LOS Description Purpose What changed Neighbours Specifications

Description

Line of Sight (LOS) refers to a specific radio propagation environment where a direct, unobstructed visual path exists between a transmitting antenna and a receiving antenna. In this condition, the radio waves travel along a straight line without encountering significant obstacles that cause reflection, diffraction, or scattering. The presence of a LOS path is a critical factor in determining the channel characteristics for a wireless link. It typically results in a stronger received signal power, lower path loss (often following a free-space path loss model), and less severe multipath fading compared to Non-Line of Sight (NLOS) conditions. The assessment of LOS is integral to radio network planning, coverage prediction, and performance evaluation.

From a technical perspective, LOS conditions are often assumed or targeted in system design and testing, especially for technologies utilizing higher frequency bands, such as millimeter wave (mmWave) in 5G NR. In these bands, signals are more susceptible to blockage and attenuation, making a clear LOS path highly desirable for maintaining a stable, high-capacity connection. Many 3GPP specifications define test requirements and measurement procedures that differentiate between LOS and NLOS propagation conditions to accurately model real-world scenarios and validate device and network performance.

The concept is applied across various 3GPP technical specifications covering requirements for User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception, Base Station (BS) conformance testing, and channel models. For instance, specifications for radiated performance testing (e.g., Total Radiated Power, Total Isotropic Sensitivity) often define specific test setups and minimum performance requirements under both LOS and NLOS conditions. Furthermore, advanced techniques like beamforming and Massive MIMO, which are central to 5G, often rely on or are optimized for scenarios where a LOS component is present to achieve maximum spectral efficiency and direct energy towards the intended user.

LOS is not merely a binary condition; it can be considered in probabilistic terms within channel models (e.g., 3GPP TR 38.901) for system-level simulations. These models define parameters like the probability of LOS for a given link distance and environment (Urban Micro, Urban Macro, Rural, etc.), which influences the path loss, shadow fading, and fast fading components generated for simulation. Accurate modeling of LOS probability is essential for realistic performance predictions of new radio technologies before deployment.

Purpose & Motivation

The concept of Line of Sight exists to provide a fundamental and standardized reference condition for analyzing and specifying the performance of radio communication links. It addresses the need to distinguish between ideal and impaired propagation environments during system design, testing, and standardization. By defining LOS, 3GPP creates a common baseline that allows for reproducible and comparable performance evaluations across different vendors, devices, and network implementations.

Historically, as cellular systems evolved from lower frequency bands (e.g., 2G, 3G) to incorporate higher frequencies in 4G LTE and especially 5G NR, the impact of propagation conditions became more pronounced. At lower frequencies, signals can better penetrate obstacles and diffract around corners, making NLOS operation more reliable. At mmWave frequencies used for 5G enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB), signals behave more like light and are easily blocked. Therefore, explicitly defining and testing for LOS conditions became critical to ensure that new air interface technologies, antenna systems, and beam management procedures function correctly in their intended operational scenarios.

The formal inclusion of LOS in 3GPP specifications solves the problem of ambiguous performance claims. Without a standardized definition, one vendor's 'good coverage' claim might be based on ideal LOS testing, while another's might be based on a more challenging NLOS environment, leading to unfair comparisons. By mandating specific test conditions and performance metrics for both LOS and NLOS in conformance and performance specifications, 3GPP ensures that devices and networks meet minimum real-world performance standards, guiding network deployment strategies (e.g., denser site planning for mmWave to maintain LOS links) and setting realistic user expectations.

What changed in its specifications

The latest release-to-release comparison of specifications that define LOS. Each summary describes the whole specification, not only this term.

TS 25.172Rel-11 → Rel-12

Added BDS support for UTRA and LTE. Changes include satellite constellation, assistance data, references, and symbols.

Full comparison in TS 25.172 →
TS 36.171Rel-11 → Rel-12

Added BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) support for UTRA and LTE. Includes test requirements, signal parameters, and assistance data models.

Full comparison in TS 36.171 →

Evolution Across Releases

An overview written from the defining specifications, not a verified change history. For the exact text, open the specifications listed below.

Rel-6 Initial

Introduced as a fundamental propagation condition in specifications for UE and base station performance testing (e.g., 25.171, 32.111). Established the baseline for defining test environments and minimum requirements for technologies like HSPA, differentiating between LOS and NLOS scenarios for accurate performance validation.

Defining Specifications

3GPP specifications that define or reference LOS, with the latest known release. Sourced from the 3GPP document catalog — see methodology.

SpecificationTitleRelease
TS 23.700 vk10 AI/ML Application Layer Support Phase 2 Rel-20 read
TS 25.171 vj00 A-GPS Minimum Performance Requirements for UTRA FDD UE Rel-19 read
TS 25.172 vj00 A-GANSS UE Minimum Performance Requirements (FDD) Rel-19 read
TS 25.173 vj00 A-GANSS Performance Requirements (TDD) Rel-19 read
TS 32.111 vj00 Fault Management Alarm IRP Solution Sets Rel-19 read
TS 36.171 vj10 A-GNSS Minimum Performance Requirements for UE Rel-19 read
TS 37.571 vj00 UE Conformance for Positioning Rel-19 read
TR 37.910 vj00 5G SRIT and NR RIT Self-Evaluation Report Rel-19 read
TS 38.171 vj10 5G A-GNSS UE Positioning Requirements Rel-19 read
TS 38.753 vj00 Spatial Channel Model Study for NR Demodulation Rel-19 read
TS 38.762 vj10 NR FR1 MIMO OTA Dynamic Test Methodology Rel-19 read
TS 38.811 vf40 Study on NR Support for Non-Terrestrial Networks Rel-15 read
TS 38.827 vg80 NR MIMO OTA Radiated Metrics & Test Methodology Rel-16 read
TR 38.828 vg10 CLI and RIM for NR Rel-16 read
TR 38.858 vi20 Technical Report on Evolution of NR Duplex Operation Rel-18 read
TR 38.900 vf00 Channel Model Study for >6 GHz Rel-15 read
TS 38.901 vj50 5G NR Channel Model Rel-19 read
TS 38.914 vk10 6G Radio Scenarios and Requirements Rel-20 read
TS 45.005 vj00 GSM RF Requirements for MS and BSS Rel-19 read